Many ask me Why do you differentiate between Sunnis and Shias despite our need for unity? So I tell them brother how can there be unity between Islam and the rejecters of Islam, or between the followers of Allah and the followers of Satan? Unity, my brother, is not accomplished at the cost of our religion and creed, but rather it should be built on the unity of creed. Remember that when the People of Israel worshipped the bull, Moses came to them and pulled the beard of his brother Haroon, who apologized to him and said: O son of my mother! Seize (me) not by my beard nor by (the hair of) my head! Truly I feared lest thou shouldn’t say, ‘Thou has caused a division among the Children of Israel, and thou didst not observe my word!’” (Taha 20:94).
Haroon had decided to leave the Israelis to what they were doing (worshiping the bull) and to wait for the opinion of Moses, because he feared causing the division of the Sons of Israel. So Moses reprimanded him with the harshest of reprimands because it is better for the people to be divided while monotheist than to stay united on polytheism. And we do not forget what is confirmed in Bukhari, that the angels described the Prophet (saws) that he “divided between people”. Shiaism (The Rafidah) and Islam are indeed different religions. This sect has developed into what we now know as the Shia whose beliefs and thoughts are repugnant beyond belief. The divergence of Shiaism from Islaam can be summarized from the books which they consider most authentic, and the statements of their most respected scholars. Some of the proofs are available on this page Most of the Muslim UMMAH and Western scholars have very little genuine and reliable knowledge of SHIA beliefs and practices. However, most of the openly declared SHIA beliefs revolve around The Concept of Imamah, the superiority of Ali (May Allah be pleased with him), and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members. As a result, the intense love that Sunni Muslims carry for the Prophet’s family members combined with the magnanimous personality of Ali has led some Sunnis to accept Shia’s as part of the Muslim UMMAH.
However, the brutal fact remains that under the pretense of Ali’s Superiority and the so-called love of the Prophet’s family members, Shias have literally evolved an entirely new religion, grossly distorted the teachings of the Holy Qur’ân, and completely rejected the sanctity and authenticity of the Hadeeth. They have elevated the sayings of their imams to the level of the Prophet’s sayings and have classified them as Hadeeth. For all practical purposes, they reject the most authentic sayings of the Prophet (Peace be upon him) and Base their religion on the so-called Hadeeth attributed to their Imaams. By doing so they have rejected one of the most fundamental principles of Islam: The law can only be derived from the sayings and actions of the Prophet (Peace be upon him), not any other human being.
And if the people of the Shi’a want unity then why do they oppress Sunnis in their countries? They allow the spilling of their blood, since the days of Qaramitah to our present days in Iran. And know that we were not the ones who started attacking the Shi’a, but they started it. And if their curses and insults were directed to us only, then we would have forgiven them. But their animosity and their curses are directed toward the family of the Prophet (saws) , his wives (the Mothers of the Believers), his sons of law, his companions, and whoever follows his Sunnah. The Shi’a admit that the first person to start cursing the companions (may Allah be pleased with them) was the Jewish Bin Saba, the founder of their sector. So it is not up to us to forgive them and the Prophet (saws) says: God has chosen me and chose for me companions. And he made them for me, so whoever insults them, upon him will be the curse of Allah, His Messenger, and all people. Allah will not accept from him any good deed or sacrifice.”
And I remind you of what came in Sahih Muslim about the incident of Ifk that the mother of the believers Aisha (may Allah be pleased with her) said:
“So, on that day, Allah’s Apostle got up on the pulpit and complained about ‘Abdullah bin Ubai (bin Salul) before his companions, saying, ‘O you Muslims! Who will relieve me from that man who has hurt me with his evil statement about my family? By Allah, I know nothing except good about my family and they have blamed a man about whom I know nothing except good and he used never to enter my home except with me.’ Sad bin Mu’adh the brother of Banu ‘Abd Al-Ashhal got up and said, ‘O Allah’s Apostle! I will relieve you from him; if he is from the tribe of Al-Aus, then I will chop his head off, and if he is from our brothers, i.e. Al-Khazraj, then order us, and we will fulfill your order.’
This hadith indicates the inclusion of the mothers of the believers with the house of the Prophet and his family. It also indicates the mandate of the killing of the ones cursing the mothers of the believers. Further, it shows that the one who defends the ones who curse the mothers of the believers is a hypocrite. And whoever labels with adultery the pure, the good, the mother of the believers, the wife of the Messenger of the Lord of all Worlds (saws), in this world and the latter day, as it was confirmed by him, then he is from the type of Abdullah bin Abi Salool, the head of the hypocrites, and the condition of the Messenger of Allah, (saws) , says: Oh Muslims, who defends me from those who hurt me in my family! And Allah says: “Those who annoy Allah and His Messenger – Allah has cursed them in this world and in the Hereafter, and has prepared for them a humiliating punishment. And those who annoy believing men and women undeservedly, bear (on themselves) a calumny and a glaring sin.” (Al-Ahzab 33:57-58) So you want to say: “No, we do not defend you, oh Messenger of Allah, against these!” so we become hypocrites defending hypocrites?
The Saba’iyyah, a sect of the Rawafid, emerged in the time of `Ali and told `Ali he was God. `Ali (may Allah be pleased with him) burned some of them to death as a result. Later, the Rawafid split into many groups like: The Zaydis, Imamis, Kaysaniyyas, Qaddahiyyas and Exaggerators (Ghullat). Some people asked Imam Zayd ibn `Ali to disavow Abu Bakr and `Umar. He would not do so, and some people refused his decision, and deserted him, thereby becoming known as Rawafid, which means : the Refusers, the Rejecters. Those who stayed with him became known as the Zaydis, and so they are technically not of the Rawafid. The exaggerators are not Muslims, these Raafidi (Shia) actually descend from Abu Lu’luah Majoosi (a Persian fire worshipper) and Abdullaah ibn Saba’ (a Jew). However they are more dangerous from the Christians themselves. Christians fight Islaam face to face (if they did) while Rafidiyah stab Islam from its back they have lot of Absurdities in their beliefs like Badah, Rajah, Mutah, Taqiyyah, etc
The Zaydis, Imamis and exaggerators split up further, with each group accusing the other of kufr. The Zaydis split into three groups: Jarudis, Sulaymanis and Butris. They all agreed on the leadership of Imam Zayd ibn `Ali ibn al-Husayn when he revolted at the time of Hisham ibn `Abdul-Malik. They are the closest of the Shiah to Ahlus-Sunnah; they merely maintain that `Ali had more right to the Caliphate, but they do not claim that he was explicitly appointed as Caliph by the Prophet (may Allah bless him and his Household and grant them peace), and hence they accept the Caliphates of Abu Bakr, `Umar and `Uthman. The Kisanis split into two groups: one claimed that Muhammad ibn Hanafiyyah, a son of `Ali, is still alive and that he is the Mahdi; the other group say he died and passed on the leadership.
The Imamis and exaggerators split into fifteen groups, among which are the Ja`faris/Ithna `Asharis (Twelvers) and the Isma`ilis. The exaggerators claimed divinity for their Imams, permitted all sorts of haram things, and in short dismissed the obligations of shari`ah.
In our Shiite section we have more then 100 Articles exposing Shia’s using their own books and writings with detailed sources so that they don’t deny it. These references are copied from the religious books of Shiite religion. While translating them we have asked forgiveness of Allah many times, for, these are very much annoying for any Muslim to read. Neither I personally wish anyone to have them but to save the innocent simple Muslims from the Shiites (Raafidah) it was necessary to write them and forward them to our fellow Muslims so that they can know the real terrifying beliefs of Shiites. Additionally I have also listed some articles about Ismailism and the Agakhanis; one of the more deviant groups within the Shia religion they are an offshoot of the Raafidah (Shiah) and share some of their characteristics. Aga Khan is their supreme leader and, in their view, has characteristics and attributes similar to those of Allaah.
And Lastly The Prophet 
said: “Whoever abuses my Companions, upon them is the curse of Allah, the Angles and all the people” (Saheeh, At-Tabaranee)
Now just read below to know what is their belief and Aqeedah?
“Allaah often lies and does mistakes.” (USOOL-E-KAAFI, page #328, yaqoob kulaini, vol 1).
“Allah has the Quality of ‘Badaa’.” (Usul Kafi- Babul bad’aa – Al- Kafi Vol- 1 -P283 India Ed.)
“We (shias) do not worship such a God who gives authority to rascals like Yazid, Mu’awiyyah and Uthmaan.” (Kashful Asraar – 107 – Khomeni..)
“The Imams posses all the knowledge granted to angels, prophets and messengers.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.255)
“The Imams know when they will die, and they do not die except by their choice. ” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.258)
“The Imaams have knowledge of whatever occurred in the past and whatever will happen in the future, and nothing is concealed from them.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.260)
“The Imams have knowledge of all the revealed books, regardless of the languages in which they were revealed. ” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.260)
“No one complied the Qur’ân completely except the Imams, and they encompass all of its knowledge. ” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.227)
“The person who says that the present Quran is complete is a liar because the “complete Quran” was compiled by Hazrat Ali” (Fasl-ul-khitaab fee tahreef kitaab rab-ul- arbab, page #4, Noori Tibri).
“The Munafiqeen (i.e. Sahaba) took very much out of Quran (took out the verses).” (Ihtijaj-e-tibri, page #382).
“When Imaam Mehdi comes he will bring with him the real and original Quran.” (Ahsan-ul-maqaal, page #336, safdar Husain najfi).
“Signs of the prophets are possessed by the Imams.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.231)
“When the Imams’ time comes, they will rule in accordance with the ruling of the Prophet David and his dynasty. These Imams will not need to ask for presentation of evidence before passing their judgements.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.397)
“There is not a single truth possessed by a people saved that which originated with the Imams, and everything which did not proceed from them is false.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.399)
“All of the earth belongs to the Imams.” (Al- Kulaini. AL- KAAFI, p.407)
“Neither we believe the Allah nor the Prophet of the God whose khalifah is Abu Bakr.” (Anwar-ul-nomania, page #278).
“All Prophets are beggar at the doorstep of Ali.” (khalqat-e-norania, page #201, Talib Husain karpalwi).
“These shia says Ali said…….I am the first and I am the last. I am the manifest and I am the hidden and I am the heir of earth.” (Rijaal Kashsi . 138. India Print.)
“Shias say that the Imaams are the face of Allaah,” (Usul- e-Kaafi -83.)
